Quadro4 200 NVS vs GeForce2 Go 200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameNV11 B2NV17 A3
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date6 February 2001 (25 years ago)22 December 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed143 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors20 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt11 Watt
Texture fill rate0.571.000
ROPs22
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 4x
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x LFH60

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.08.0
OpenGL1.21.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2001 22 December 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 180 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 11 Watt

GeForce2 Go 200 has 450% lower power consumption.

Quadro4 200 NVS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 200 and Quadro4 200 NVS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 200 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro4 200 NVS is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 2 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Quadro4 200 NVS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Go 200 or Quadro4 200 NVS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.