Arc 7 A780 vs GeForce2 Go 100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV11 B2DG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 February 2001 (25 years ago)2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed125 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors20 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology180 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5563.2
Floating-point processing powerno data18.02 TFLOPS
ROPs2128
TMUs4256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 MB16 GB
Memory bus width32 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz17.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1.328 GB/s559.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX7.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 180 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce2 Go 100 has 9900% lower power consumption.

Arc 7 A780, on the other hand, has a 102300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce2 Go 100 and Arc 7 A780. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce2 Go 100 is a notebook graphics card while Arc 7 A780 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 5 votes

Rate GeForce2 Go 100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 42 votes

Rate Arc 7 A780 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce2 Go 100 or Arc 7 A780, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.