Radeon RX 9050 vs GeForce RTX 5080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 5080 and Radeon RX 9050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5080
2025, $999
16 GB GDDR7, 360 Watt
85.16
+249%

RTX 5080 outperforms RX 9050 by a whopping 249% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5264
Place by popularity64not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation49.18no data
Power efficiency18.4220.66
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGB203Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date30 January 2025 (1 year ago)28 July 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107521024
Core clock speed2295 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed2617 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors45,600 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)360 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate879.3166.4
Floating-point processing power56.28 TFLOPSno data
ROPs11264
TMUs33664
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores8416
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache10.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length304 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth960.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 5080 85.16
+249%
RX 9050 24.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 5080 35628
+249%
Samples: 21362
RX 9050 10208
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19955−60
−72.4%
1440p14840−45
−73%
4K10127−30
−73.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.02no data
1440p6.75no data
4K9.89no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 240−250
+250%
70−75
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+249%
95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+272%
60−65

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 240−250
+250%
70−75
Battlefield 5 190−200
+258%
55−60
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+249%
95−100
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+272%
60−65
Far Cry 5 230−240
+258%
65−70
Fortnite 300−350
+255%
85−90
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+262%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+284%
45−50
Valorant 550−600
+250%
170−180

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 240−250
+250%
70−75
Battlefield 5 190−200
+258%
55−60
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+249%
95−100
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+271%
75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+272%
60−65
Far Cry 5 230−240
+258%
65−70
Far Cry 6 84
+250%
24−27
Fortnite 300−350
+255%
85−90
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+262%
95−100
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+287%
45−50
Metro Exodus 65
+261%
18−20
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+284%
45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450
+266%
110−120
Valorant 550−600
+250%
170−180

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+258%
55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+272%
60−65
Far Cry 5 230−240
+258%
65−70
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+262%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+284%
45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 279
+272%
75−80
Valorant 550−600
+250%
170−180

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+255%
85−90

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 280−290
+261%
80−85
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+269%
140−150
Far Cry 6 222
+270%
60−65
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+271%
45−50
Metro Exodus 173
+284%
45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+250%
50−55
Valorant 450−500
+273%
130−140

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+256%
55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+250%
40−45
Far Cry 5 220−230
+249%
65−70
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+260%
85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 232
+257%
65−70

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+278%
40−45

4K
High

Atomic Heart 90
+275%
24−27
Counter-Strike 2 55
+293%
14−16
Far Cry 6 136
+289%
35−40
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190
+274%
50−55
Metro Exodus 120−130
+251%
35−40
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 232
+257%
65−70
Valorant 300−350
+253%
90−95

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+289%
35−40
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+283%
35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+283%
18−20
Far Cry 5 160−170
+273%
45−50
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+259%
85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+256%
27−30

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+276%
21−24

This is how RTX 5080 and RX 9050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 is 262% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 is 270% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 is 274% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 85.16 24.40
Recency 30 January 2025 28 July 2026
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 360 Watt 92 Watt

RTX 5080 has a 249% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 74% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9050 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 3518 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5080 or Radeon RX 9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.