Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 4090 Mobile
2023
16 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
64.61
AI PRO R9700
2025, $1,299
32 GB GDDR6, 300 Watt
65.29
+1.1%

AI PRO R9700 outperforms RTX 4090 Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3029
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data28.34
Power efficiency41.9316.95
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD103Navi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2023 (3 years ago)23 July 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores97284096
Core clock speed1335 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors45,900 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology4 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate515.3747.5
Floating-point processing power32.98 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs112128
TMUs304256
Tensor Cores304128
Ray Tracing Cores7664
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cache9.5 MBno data
L2 Cache64 MB8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount16 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth576.0 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.9-
DLSS++

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4090 Mobile 64.61
AI PRO R9700 65.29
+1.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4090 Mobile 27032
Samples: 3307
AI PRO R9700 27314
+1%
Samples: 120

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD167
+4.4%
160−170
1440p126
+5%
120−130
4K77
+2.7%
75−80

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.12
1440pno data10.83
4Kno data17.32

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 211
+0.5%
210−220
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+3.7%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+5%
140−150
Resident Evil 4 Remake 218 220−230
+0.9%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 174
+2.4%
170−180
Battlefield 5 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Counter-Strike 2 240 240−250
Cyberpunk 2077 142
+1.4%
140−150
Far Cry 5 173
+1.8%
170−180
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 260−270
+0.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
Valorant 350−400
+9.4%
350−400

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 167
+4.4%
160−170
Battlefield 5 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Counter-Strike 2 214
+1.9%
210−220
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+2.3%
130−140
Dota 2 199 200−210
+0.5%
Far Cry 5 167
+4.4%
160−170
Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 260−270
+0.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+1.3%
160−170
Metro Exodus 156
+4%
150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 394
+12.6%
350−400
Valorant 350−400
+9.4%
350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 128
+6.7%
120−130
Dota 2 187
+3.9%
180−190
Far Cry 5 158
+5.3%
150−160
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 260−270
+0.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1.8%
170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 204
+2%
200−210
Valorant 350−400
+9.4%
350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0.7%
300−310

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 173
+1.8%
170−180
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 516
+3.2%
500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+6.2%
130−140
Metro Exodus 117
+6.4%
110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
Valorant 485
+7.8%
450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+3.1%
160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 95 95−100
Far Cry 5 151
+0.7%
150−160
Forza Horizon 4 220−230
+0.9%
220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 164
+2.5%
160−170

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0.7%
150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 88
+3.5%
85−90
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 314
+4.7%
300−310
Grand Theft Auto V 172
+1.2%
170−180
Metro Exodus 82
+2.5%
80−85
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150 150−160
Valorant 300−350
+6%
300−310

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0.8%
120−130
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+6.7%
45−50
Dota 2 179 180−190
+0.6%
Far Cry 5 107
+7%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+2.4%
170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+1.1%
95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+5.3%
75−80

This is how RTX 4090 Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 4% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 5% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 3% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 64.61 65.29
Recency 3 January 2023 23 July 2025
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 32 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 4090 Mobile has 60% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile and Radeon AI PRO R9700.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 919 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 40 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.