Radeon RX 9050 vs GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER and Radeon RX 9050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 4070 SUPER
2024, $599
12 GB GDDR6X, 220 Watt
71.57
+193%

RTX 4070 SUPER outperforms RX 9050 by a whopping 193% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking18264
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation70.97no data
Power efficiency25.3420.66
ArchitectureAda Lovelace (2022−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAD104Navi 44
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 January 2024 (2 years ago)28 July 2026 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71681024
Core clock speed1980 MHz1330 MHz
Boost clock speed2475 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors35,800 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt92 Watt
Texture fill rate554.4166.4
Floating-point processing power35.48 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8064
TMUs22464
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Cores5616
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache7 MBno data
L2 Cache48 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth504.2 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.9-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 4070 SUPER 71.57
+193%
RX 9050 24.40

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 4070 SUPER 29943
+193%
Samples: 15959
RX 9050 10208
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21470−75
−67.3%
1440p13345−50
−66.2%
4K81
+200%
27−30

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.80no data
1440p4.50no data
4K7.40no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 220−230
+193%
75−80
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+195%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 196
+202%
65−70

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 220−230
+193%
75−80
Battlefield 5 180−190
+208%
60−65
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+195%
110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 184
+207%
60−65
Far Cry 5 203
+212%
65−70
Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+207%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+215%
55−60
Valorant 400−450
+195%
150−160

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 220−230
+193%
75−80
Battlefield 5 180−190
+208%
60−65
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+195%
110−120
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+209%
90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 159
+218%
50−55
Far Cry 5 200
+208%
65−70
Far Cry 6 185
+208%
60−65
Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+207%
95−100
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+215%
55−60
Metro Exodus 185
+208%
60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+215%
55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 412
+194%
140−150
Valorant 400−450
+195%
150−160

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190
+208%
60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 144
+220%
45−50
Far Cry 5 190
+217%
60−65
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+207%
95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+215%
55−60
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 201
+209%
65−70
Valorant 400−450
+195%
150−160

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+202%
100−105

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+207%
75−80
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+204%
170−180
Far Cry 6 143
+218%
45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 148
+196%
50−55
Metro Exodus 118
+195%
40−45
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+218%
55−60
Valorant 450−500
+203%
160−170

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+197%
65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 92
+207%
30−33
Far Cry 5 183
+205%
60−65
Forza Horizon 4 250−260
+204%
85−90
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154
+208%
50−55

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+202%
50−55

4K
High

Atomic Heart 70−75
+196%
24−27
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+197%
35−40
Far Cry 6 81
+200%
27−30
Grand Theft Auto V 166
+202%
55−60
Metro Exodus 74
+208%
24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 133
+196%
45−50
Valorant 300−350
+218%
100−105

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+202%
45−50
Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+197%
35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+214%
14−16
Far Cry 5 103
+194%
35−40
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+209%
70−75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+220%
30−33

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+229%
24−27

This is how RTX 4070 SUPER and RX 9050 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 206% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 196% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 SUPER is 200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 71.57 24.40
Recency 8 January 2024 28 July 2026
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 92 Watt

RTX 4070 SUPER has a 193% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 9050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 20% more advanced lithography process, and 58% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 9050 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7896 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER or Radeon RX 9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.