ATI Radeon HD 4890 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and Radeon HD 4890, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms HD 4890 by a whopping 1361% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 58 | 776 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 63.95 | 0.42 |
| Power efficiency | 25.42 | 1.51 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | TeraScale (2005−2013) |
| GPU code name | AD106 | RV790 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release date | 18 May 2023 (3 years ago) | 2 April 2009 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | $249 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 15126% better value for money than ATI HD 4890.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 4352 | 800 |
| Core clock speed | 2310 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2535 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 22,900 million | 959 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 190 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 344.8 | 34.00 |
| Floating-point processing power | 22.06 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 16 |
| TMUs | 136 | 40 |
| Tensor Cores | 136 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 4.3 MB | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 MB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 240 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 2x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2250 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 124.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 10.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 172
+1620%
| 10−12
−1620%
|
| 1440p | 92
+1433%
| 6−7
−1433%
|
| 4K | 55
+1733%
| 3−4
−1733%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 2.90
+758%
| 24.90
−758%
|
| 1440p | 5.42
+665%
| 41.50
−665%
|
| 4K | 9.07
+815%
| 83.00
−815%
|
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 758% lower cost per frame in 1080p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 665% lower cost per frame in 1440p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has 815% lower cost per frame in 4K
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1456%
|
18−20
−1456%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 176
+1367%
|
12−14
−1367%
|
| Palworld | 150−160
+1420%
|
10−11
−1420%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 203
+1592%
|
12−14
−1592%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1500%
|
10−11
−1500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1456%
|
18−20
−1456%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 137
+1422%
|
9−10
−1422%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 191
+1492%
|
12−14
−1492%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1413%
|
16−18
−1413%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1407%
|
14−16
−1407%
|
| Palworld | 150−160
+1420%
|
10−11
−1420%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1630%
|
10−11
−1630%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+1567%
|
18−20
−1567%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1500%
|
10−11
−1500%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 280−290
+1456%
|
18−20
−1456%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+1444%
|
18−20
−1444%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 115
+1543%
|
7−8
−1543%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 182
+1417%
|
12−14
−1417%
|
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1413%
|
16−18
−1413%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1407%
|
14−16
−1407%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 163
+1530%
|
10−11
−1530%
|
| Metro Exodus | 130
+1525%
|
8−9
−1525%
|
| Palworld | 150−160
+1420%
|
10−11
−1420%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1630%
|
10−11
−1630%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 270
+1400%
|
18−20
−1400%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+1567%
|
18−20
−1567%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 160−170
+1500%
|
10−11
−1500%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+1371%
|
7−8
−1371%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 171
+1610%
|
10−11
−1610%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+1407%
|
14−16
−1407%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1630%
|
10−11
−1630%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 132
+1367%
|
9−10
−1367%
|
| Valorant | 300−310
+1567%
|
18−20
−1567%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 240−250
+1413%
|
16−18
−1413%
|
| Palworld | 150−160
+1420%
|
10−11
−1420%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+1470%
|
10−11
−1470%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 400−450
+1393%
|
27−30
−1393%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+1583%
|
6−7
−1583%
|
| Metro Exodus | 79
+1480%
|
5−6
−1480%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1650%
|
10−11
−1650%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1562%
|
21−24
−1562%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+1389%
|
9−10
−1389%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 62
+1450%
|
4−5
−1450%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 127
+1488%
|
8−9
−1488%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 170−180
+1630%
|
10−11
−1630%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 96
+1500%
|
6−7
−1500%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160
+1410%
|
10−11
−1410%
|
| Palworld | 90−95
+1433%
|
6−7
−1433%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+1650%
|
4−5
−1650%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 101
+1583%
|
6−7
−1583%
|
| Metro Exodus | 48
+1500%
|
3−4
−1500%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
+1767%
|
3−4
−1767%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 79
+1480%
|
5−6
−1480%
|
| Valorant | 300−350
+1376%
|
21−24
−1376%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+1450%
|
6−7
−1450%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 70−75
+1650%
|
4−5
−1650%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27
+2600%
|
1−2
−2600%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+1525%
|
4−5
−1525%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120−130
+1450%
|
8−9
−1450%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 95−100
+1483%
|
6−7
−1483%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 75−80
+1480%
|
5−6
−1480%
|
| Palworld | 55−60
+1767%
|
3−4
−1767%
|
This is how RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and ATI HD 4890 compete in popular games:
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1620% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1433% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1733% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 54.21 | 3.71 |
| Recency | 18 May 2023 | 2 April 2009 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 55 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 190 Watt |
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB has a 1361% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1000% more advanced lithography process, and 15% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4890 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
