Radeon RX 6600 LE vs GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile with Radeon RX 6600 LE, including specs and performance data.
RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms 6600 LE by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 173 | 180 |
| Place by popularity | 14 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 52.87 | 19.52 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | AD107 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) | 8 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 1792 |
| Core clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1626 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1755 MHz | 2495 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 18,900 million | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 132 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 140.4 | 279.4 |
| Floating-point processing power | 8.986 TFLOPS | 8.942 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 |
| TMUs | 80 | 112 |
| Tensor Cores | 80 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 20 | 28 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 448 KB |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 12 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | no data | 32 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | no data | 190 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 96 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 16000 GB/s | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.9 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 93
+3.3%
| 90−95 |
| 1440p | 49
+8.9%
| 45−50 |
| 4K | 29
+7.4%
| 27−30 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 132
+10%
|
120−130 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 190−200
+6.7%
|
180−190 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 103
+3%
|
100−105 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 81
+8%
|
75−80 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 124
+3.3%
|
120−130 |
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+11.8%
|
110−120 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 166
+3.8%
|
160−170 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 82
+9.3%
|
75−80 |
| Far Cry 5 | 124
+3.3%
|
120−130 |
| Fortnite | 150−160
+9.3%
|
140−150 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+3.1%
|
130−140 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+6.2%
|
130−140 |
| Valorant | 210−220
+6%
|
200−210 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 72
+2.9%
|
70−75 |
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+11.8%
|
110−120 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 112
+12%
|
100−105 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+3%
|
270−280 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 69
+6.2%
|
65−70 |
| Dota 2 | 169
+5.6%
|
160−170 |
| Far Cry 5 | 114
+3.6%
|
110−120 |
| Fortnite | 150−160
+9.3%
|
140−150 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+3.1%
|
130−140 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 124
+3.3%
|
120−130 |
| Metro Exodus | 85
+6.3%
|
80−85 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+6.2%
|
130−140 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 156
+4%
|
150−160 |
| Valorant | 210−220
+6%
|
200−210 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 120−130
+11.8%
|
110−120 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 65
+8.3%
|
60−65 |
| Dota 2 | 162
+8%
|
150−160 |
| Far Cry 5 | 107
+7%
|
100−105 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+3.1%
|
130−140 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+6.2%
|
130−140 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 80
+6.7%
|
75−80 |
| Valorant | 138
+6.2%
|
130−140 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 150−160
+9.3%
|
140−150 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 79
+5.3%
|
75−80 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 240−250
+4.8%
|
230−240 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 58
+5.5%
|
55−60 |
| Metro Exodus | 50
+11.1%
|
45−50 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+2.9%
|
170−180 |
| Valorant | 240−250
+6.5%
|
230−240 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 90−95
+5.9%
|
85−90 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 37
+5.7%
|
35−40 |
| Far Cry 5 | 69
+6.2%
|
65−70 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 95−100
+5.6%
|
90−95 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 58
+5.5%
|
55−60 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 85−90
+4.7%
|
85−90 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+3.7%
|
27−30 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 24
+14.3%
|
21−24 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 60
+9.1%
|
55−60 |
| Metro Exodus | 45
+12.5%
|
40−45 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45
+12.5%
|
40−45 |
| Valorant | 200−210
+4.5%
|
200−210 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+8%
|
50−55 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+11.4%
|
35−40 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+12.5%
|
16−18 |
| Dota 2 | 115
+4.5%
|
110−120 |
| Far Cry 5 | 43
+7.5%
|
40−45 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+5%
|
60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+7.5%
|
40−45 |
This is how RTX 4050 Mobile and RX 6600 LE compete in popular games:
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 9% faster in 1440p
- RTX 4050 Mobile is 7% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.94 | 33.08 |
| Recency | 3 January 2023 | 8 December 2023 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 132 Watt |
RTX 4050 Mobile has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, a 29% more advanced lithography process, and 62% lower power consumption.
RX 6600 LE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile and Radeon RX 6600 LE.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6600 LE is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
