GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 vs RTX 3090 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.66no data
Power efficiency12.07no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGA102G98
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date27 January 2022 (4 years ago)4 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores107528
Core clock speed1560 MHz580 MHz
Boost clock speed1860 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)450 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate625.02.320
Floating-point processing power40 TFLOPS0.0232 TFLOPS
ROPs1124
TMUs3364
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores84no data
L1 Cache10.5 MBno data
L2 Cache6 MB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-I
Length336 mmno data
Width3-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 16-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XDDR2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB256 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1313 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.01 TB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.84.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.4N/A
CUDA8.61.1
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 January 2022 4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 8 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 450 Watt 13 Watt

RTX 3090 Ti has an age advantage of 13 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

9300M GS DDR2, on the other hand, has 3362% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3090 Ti and GeForce 9300M GS DDR2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 3744 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3090 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9300M GS DDR2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3090 Ti or GeForce 9300M GS DDR2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.