GMA 3150 vs GeForce RTX 3080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking431620
Place by popularity65not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation36.13no data
Power efficiency14.50no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGA102Pineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 September 2020 (6 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores870416
Core clock speed1440 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1710 MHzno data
Number of transistors28,300 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)320 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate465.10.8
Floating-point processing power29.77 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs961
TMUs2722
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores68no data
L1 Cache8.5 MBno data
L2 Cache5 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCI
Length285 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount10 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width320 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1188 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth760.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA8.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3080 24985
+1249150%
Samples: 32830
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD165no data
1440p123no data
4K85no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.24no data
1440p5.68no data
4K8.22no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 307 no data
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 no data

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 239 no data
Battlefield 5 172 no data
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 138 no data
Far Cry 5 157 no data
Fortnite 280−290 no data
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 no data
Forza Horizon 5 152 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 147 no data
Battlefield 5 156 no data
Counter-Strike 2 290−300 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 134 no data
Dota 2 147 no data
Far Cry 5 150 no data
Fortnite 280−290 no data
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 no data
Forza Horizon 5 140 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 147 no data
Metro Exodus 128 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 303 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 145 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 131 no data
Dota 2 135 no data
Far Cry 5 140 no data
Forza Horizon 4 230−240 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 149 no data
Valorant 268 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 180−190 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 112 no data
Metro Exodus 95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 400−450 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 124 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 86 no data
Far Cry 5 135 no data
Forza Horizon 4 190−200 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140−150 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 no data

4K
High

Atomic Heart 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 143 no data
Metro Exodus 65 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 115 no data
Valorant 300−350 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 91 no data
Counter-Strike 2 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 43 no data
Dota 2 129 no data
Far Cry 5 94 no data
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2020 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 8 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 320 Watt 13 Watt

RTX 3080 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 463% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 2362% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 3080 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3080 is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8546 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3080 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.