Radeon Pro V620 vs GeForce RTX 3070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 with Radeon Pro V620, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070
2020, $499
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
52.74

Pro V620 outperforms RTX 3070 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking6338
Place by popularity21not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation44.22no data
Power efficiency18.6716.45
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA104Navi 21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (6 years ago)4 November 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores58884608
Core clock speed1500 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate317.4633.6
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96128
TMUs184288
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores4672
L0 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L1 Cache5.8 MB1 MB
L2 Cache4 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.21.4
CUDA8.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3070 52.74
Pro V620 63.38
+20.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3070 22066
Samples: 39591
Pro V620 26519
+20.2%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD149170−180
+14.1%
1440p99
−10%
110−120
4K6375−80
+19%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.35no data
1440p5.04no data
4K7.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 263 300−310
+14.1%
Counter-Strike 2 270−280 300−310
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 147 170−180
+15.6%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 198 230−240
+16.2%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 196 230−240
+17.3%
Battlefield 5 149 170−180
+14.1%
Counter-Strike 2 330 350−400
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 139 160−170
+15.1%
Far Cry 5 154 180−190
+16.9%
Fortnite 230−240 280−290
+19.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 240−250
+17.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+15.1%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 113 130−140
+15%
Battlefield 5 132 150−160
+13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 257 300−310
+16.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 126 150−160
+19%
Dota 2 133 150−160
+12.8%
Far Cry 5 148 170−180
+14.9%
Fortnite 230−240 280−290
+19.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 240−250
+17.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 139 160−170
+15.1%
Metro Exodus 120 140−150
+16.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230 270−280
+17.4%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+15.1%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 119 140−150
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 102 120−130
+17.6%
Dota 2 125 150−160
+20%
Far Cry 5 141 160−170
+13.5%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 240−250
+17.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 200−210
+15.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121 140−150
+15.7%
Valorant 237 280−290
+18.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240 280−290
+19.7%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 167 200−210
+19.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 450−500
+15.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 98 110−120
+12.2%
Metro Exodus 75 90−95
+20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 210−220
+20%
Valorant 350−400 400−450
+14.3%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103 120−130
+16.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 62 70−75
+12.9%
Far Cry 5 125 150−160
+20%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 200−210
+19.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 140−150
+18.6%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 170−180
+14.9%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 45−50 55−60
+19.6%
Counter-Strike 2 43 50−55
+16.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 117 140−150
+19.7%
Metro Exodus 49 55−60
+12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 100−105
+11.1%
Valorant 300−350 350−400
+14%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70 80−85
+14.3%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 80−85
+17.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 30 35−40
+16.7%
Dota 2 125 150−160
+20%
Far Cry 5 70 80−85
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 140−150
+17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 110−120
+19.6%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 90−95
+15.4%

This is how RTX 3070 and Pro V620 compete in popular games:

  • Pro V620 is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Pro V620 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • Pro V620 is 19% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 52.74 63.38
Recency 1 September 2020 4 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 300 Watt

RTX 3070 has 27% lower power consumption.

Pro V620, on the other hand, has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 13% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro V620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro V620 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15264 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Radeon Pro V620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 or Radeon Pro V620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.