Radeon RX 7800M vs GeForce RTX 3060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3060 with Radeon RX 7800M, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3060
2021, $329
12 GB GDDR6, 170 Watt
40.36

7800M outperforms RTX 3060 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking118106
Place by popularity2not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.09no data
Power efficiency18.4918.16
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGA106Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date12 January 2021 (5 years ago)11 September 2024 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35843840
Core clock speed1320 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1777 MHz2539 MHz
Number of transistors12,000 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate199.0609.4
Floating-point processing power12.74 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4896
TMUs112240
Tensor Cores112no data
Ray Tracing Cores2860
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cache3.5 MB768 KB
L2 Cache3 MB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length242 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB12 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1875 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth360.0 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4aPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3060 40.36
RX 7800M 41.98
+4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 16885
Samples: 2910
RX 7800M 17562
+4%
Samples: 56

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107110−120
+2.8%
1440p6060−65
+0%
4K4040−45
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.07no data
1440p5.48no data
4K8.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 230−240
+2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 79 80−85
+1.3%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 110−120
+0.9%
110−120

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 230−240
+2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 78 80−85
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 146 150−160
+2.7%
Fortnite 170−180 180−190
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+0.6%
Valorant 240−250 250−260
+3.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 120−130
+3.3%
120−130
Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+2.2%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230 230−240
+2.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 280−290
+0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75−80
Dota 2 156 160−170
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 135 140−150
+3.7%
Fortnite 170−180 180−190
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+1.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0.7%
140−150
Metro Exodus 81
+1.3%
80−85
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 179 180−190
+0.6%
Valorant 240−250 250−260
+3.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 140−150
+2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 64 65−70
+1.6%
Dota 2 147 150−160
+2%
Far Cry 5 127 130−140
+2.4%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160 160−170
+1.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160 160−170
+0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87 90−95
+3.4%
Valorant 240−250 250−260
+3.7%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180 180−190
+2.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110 110−120
+3.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 290−300
+0.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+1.3%
80−85
Metro Exodus 50 50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 180−190
+2.9%
Valorant 270−280 280−290
+1.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+3%
100−105
Cyberpunk 2077 39 40−45
+2.6%
Far Cry 5 94 95−100
+1.1%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 120−130
+1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+2.9%
70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 110−120

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35
+10%
30−33
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
Grand Theft Auto V 82 85−90
+3.7%
Metro Exodus 32
+6.7%
30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65 65−70
Valorant 250−260 260−270
+3.6%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+1.5%
65−70
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+6.7%
45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 18 18−20
Dota 2 115
+4.5%
110−120
Far Cry 5 48
+6.7%
45−50
Forza Horizon 4 75−80 80−85
+1.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+3.6%
55−60

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 55−60

This is how RTX 3060 and RX 7800M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800M is 3% faster in 1080p
  • A tie in 1440p
  • A tie in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.36 41.98
Recency 12 January 2021 11 September 2024
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 180 Watt

RTX 3060 has 6% lower power consumption.

RX 7800M, on the other hand, has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 7800M.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3060 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 7800M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 40830 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 16 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3060 or Radeon RX 7800M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.