Radeon R9 380X vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Radeon R9 380X, including specs and performance data.
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms R9 380X by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 298 | 405 |
| Place by popularity | 46 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 7.10 |
| Power efficiency | 28.43 | 6.01 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | GN20-P0 | Antigua |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Design | no data | reference |
| Release date | 11 May 2021 (5 years ago) | 19 November 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $229 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute units | no data | 32 |
| Core clock speed | 1238 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1500 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP) | 190 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 124.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 3.973 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 128 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 221 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Form factor | no data | full height / full length |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2 x 6-pin |
| Bridgeless CrossFire | - | + |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| High bandwidth memory (HBM) | no data | - |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 970 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 182.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Eyefinity | - | + |
| Number of Eyefinity displays | no data | 6 |
| HDMI | - | + |
| DisplayPort support | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| CrossFire | - | + |
| FRTC | - | + |
| FreeSync | - | + |
| HD3D | - | + |
| LiquidVR | - | + |
| PowerTune | - | + |
| TrueAudio | - | + |
| ZeroCore | - | + |
| VCE | - | + |
| DDMA audio | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12_2 | DirectX® 12 |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | + |
| Mantle | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 59
+68.6%
| 35−40 |
| 1440p | 43
+59.3%
| 27−30 |
| 4K | 27
+50%
| 18−20 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | no data | 6.54 |
| 1440p | no data | 8.48 |
| 4K | no data | 12.72 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 71
+57.8%
|
45−50 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 170
+54.5%
|
110−120 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 66
+65%
|
40−45 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 54
+54.3%
|
35−40 |
| Battlefield 5 | 93
+55%
|
60−65 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 125
+56.3%
|
80−85 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 52
+73.3%
|
30−33 |
| Far Cry 5 | 68
+51.1%
|
45−50 |
| Fortnite | 110−120
+50.7%
|
75−80 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+50%
|
60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+58.2%
|
55−60 |
| Valorant | 150−160
+57%
|
100−105 |
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 32
+52.4%
|
21−24 |
| Battlefield 5 | 89
+61.8%
|
55−60 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 36
+50%
|
24−27 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 240−250
+55.6%
|
160−170 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 41
+51.9%
|
27−30 |
| Dota 2 | 118
+57.3%
|
75−80 |
| Far Cry 5 | 64
+60%
|
40−45 |
| Far Cry 6 | 60
+50%
|
40−45 |
| Fortnite | 110−120
+50.7%
|
75−80 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+50%
|
60−65 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 86
+56.4%
|
55−60 |
| Metro Exodus | 49
+63.3%
|
30−33 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+58.2%
|
55−60 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 81
+62%
|
50−55 |
| Valorant | 150−160
+57%
|
100−105 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 83
+50.9%
|
55−60 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 34
+61.9%
|
21−24 |
| Dota 2 | 112
+60%
|
70−75 |
| Far Cry 5 | 61
+52.5%
|
40−45 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+50%
|
60−65 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 85−90
+58.2%
|
55−60 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 46
+53.3%
|
30−33 |
| Valorant | 150−160
+57%
|
100−105 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 110−120
+50.7%
|
75−80 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+56.7%
|
30−33 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 160−170
+60%
|
100−105 |
| Far Cry 6 | 50
+66.7%
|
30−33 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 48
+60%
|
30−33 |
| Metro Exodus | 29
+61.1%
|
18−20 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+58.2%
|
110−120 |
| Valorant | 180−190
+53.3%
|
120−130 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 66
+65%
|
40−45 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18
+50%
|
12−14 |
| Far Cry 5 | 49
+63.3%
|
30−33 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 55−60
+62.9%
|
35−40 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+66.7%
|
21−24 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 50−55
+51.4%
|
35−40 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 18−20
+50%
|
12−14 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16 |
| Far Cry 6 | 12−14
+50%
|
8−9 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 44
+63%
|
27−30 |
| Metro Exodus | 17
+70%
|
10−11 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 29
+61.1%
|
18−20 |
| Valorant | 120−130
+52.5%
|
80−85 |
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35
+66.7%
|
21−24 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+57.1%
|
14−16 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6
+50%
|
4−5 |
| Dota 2 | 62
+55%
|
40−45 |
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+58.3%
|
12−14 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+62.5%
|
24−27 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 21−24
+64.3%
|
14−16 |
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 24−27
+50%
|
16−18 |
This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and R9 380X compete in popular games:
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 69% faster in 1080p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 59% faster in 1440p
- RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 50% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 21.90 | 14.65 |
| Recency | 11 May 2021 | 19 November 2015 |
| Chip lithography | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 190 Watt |
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 71% more advanced lithography process, and 68% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 380X in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R9 380X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
