UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.
RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms Graphics 750 by a whopping 696% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 180 | 741 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 22.29 | 21.47 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | TU104B | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 April 2020 (6 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2560 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 1140 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1380 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 13,600 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 220.8 | 20.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | 7.066 TFLOPS | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64 | 8 |
| TMUs | 160 | 16 |
| Tensor Cores | 320 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 7.5 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 119
+750%
| 14−16
−750%
|
| 1440p | 78
+767%
| 9−10
−767%
|
| 4K | 45
+800%
| 5−6
−800%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 95−100
+880%
|
10−11
−880%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+939%
|
18−20
−939%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+850%
|
8−9
−850%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 95−100
+880%
|
10−11
−880%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 166
+876%
|
16−18
−876%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+939%
|
18−20
−939%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+850%
|
8−9
−850%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+808%
|
12−14
−808%
|
| Fortnite | 164
+583%
|
24−27
−583%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+550%
|
20−22
−550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+864%
|
10−12
−864%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+688%
|
16−18
−688%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+271%
|
55−60
−271%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 95−100
+880%
|
10−11
−880%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 152
+794%
|
16−18
−794%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 180−190
+939%
|
18−20
−939%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+274%
|
70−75
−274%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+850%
|
8−9
−850%
|
| Dota 2 | 130
+713%
|
16−18
−713%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 100−110
+808%
|
12−14
−808%
|
| Fortnite | 156
+550%
|
24−27
−550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+550%
|
20−22
−550%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 100−110
+864%
|
10−12
−864%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 129
+892%
|
12−14
−892%
|
| Metro Exodus | 87
+988%
|
8−9
−988%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+688%
|
16−18
−688%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 163
+1258%
|
12−14
−1258%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+271%
|
55−60
−271%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 141
+729%
|
16−18
−729%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 75−80
+850%
|
8−9
−850%
|
| Dota 2 | 124
+786%
|
14−16
−786%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 105
+775%
|
12−14
−775%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 130−140
+550%
|
20−22
−550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 130−140
+688%
|
16−18
−688%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 87
+625%
|
12−14
−625%
|
| Valorant | 163
+191%
|
55−60
−191%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 129
+438%
|
24−27
−438%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 80−85
+900%
|
8−9
−900%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 230−240
+634%
|
30−35
−634%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 65−70
+3300%
|
2−3
−3300%
|
| Metro Exodus | 54
+2600%
|
2−3
−2600%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+430%
|
30−35
−430%
|
| Valorant | 240−250
+471%
|
40−45
−471%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 110
+10900%
|
1−2
−10900%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 35−40
+1133%
|
3−4
−1133%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85
+1043%
|
7−8
−1043%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 90−95
+820%
|
10−11
−820%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 60−65
+900%
|
6−7
−900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 93
+1063%
|
8−9
−1063%
|
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 27−30
+800%
|
3−4
−800%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+825%
|
4−5
−825%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 70−75
+338%
|
16−18
−338%
|
| Metro Exodus | 32
+700%
|
4−5
−700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 59
+743%
|
7−8
−743%
|
| Valorant | 200−210
+1022%
|
18−20
−1022%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 63 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40
+825%
|
4−5
−825%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+1600%
|
1−2
−1600%
|
| Dota 2 | 100−110
+742%
|
12−14
−742%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40−45
+1333%
|
3−4
−1333%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 60−65
+1120%
|
5−6
−1120%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+925%
|
4−5
−925%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 48
+1100%
|
4−5
−1100%
|
This is how RTX 2070 Super Mobile and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 750% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 767% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 800% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 10900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 2070 Super Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 55 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 33.12 | 4.16 |
| Recency | 2 April 2020 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 15 Watt |
RTX 2070 Super Mobile has a 696% higher aggregate performance score, and a 17% more advanced lithography process.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 667% lower power consumption.
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
