GeForce 6800 Ultra vs RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.32
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameTU106BNV45
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 June 2020 (6 years ago)26 July 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304no data
Core clock speed900 MHz425 MHz
Boost clock speed1125 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt81 Watt
Texture fill rate162.06.800
Floating-point processing power5.184 TFLOPSno data
ROPs6416
TMUs14416
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data
L1 Cache2.3 MBno data
L2 Cache4 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data197 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1375 MHz550 MHz
Memory bandwidth352.0 GB/s35.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2N/A
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 2020 26 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 12 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 81 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.

6800 Ultra, on the other hand, has 42% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh and GeForce 6800 Ultra. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 6800 Ultra is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 11 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 20 votes

Rate GeForce 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh or GeForce 6800 Ultra, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.