Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce RTX 2060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 TU106 RTX 2060 RTX 2060 12 GB RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 2070
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
PRO V710 PRO W7400 PRO W7500 PRO W7600 PRO W7700 PRO W7800 PRO W7800 48 GB PRO W7900 PRO W7900 Dual Slot PRO W7900D

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 with Radeon PRO W7700, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060
2019, $349
6 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
33.64
PRO W7700
2023, $999
16 GB GDDR6, 190 Watt
54.56
+62.2%

PRO W7700 outperforms RTX 2060 by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
PRO W7700 PRO W7700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17754
Place by popularity19not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.0031.51
Power efficiency16.3722.36
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 January 2019 (7 years ago)13 November 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

PRO W7700 has 21% better value for money than RTX 2060.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19203072
Core clock speed1365 MHz1617 MHz
Boost clock speed1680 MHz2153 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6413.4
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4896
TMUs120192
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores3048
L0 Cacheno data768 KB
L1 Cache1.9 MB768 KB
L2 Cache3 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2060 33.64
PRO W7700 54.56
+62.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 14072
Samples: 34535
PRO W7700 22825
+62.2%
Samples: 87

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120190−200
+58.3%
1440p76
−36.7%
120−130
4K5080−85
+60%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.91
+44.7%
5.26
1440p4.59
+44.8%
8.33
4K6.98
+44.1%
12.49
  • RTX 2060 has 45% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 has 45% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 has 44% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 100−110 160−170
+58.4%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200 300−310
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 120−130
+53.8%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 100−110 160−170
+58.4%
Battlefield 5 145 230−240
+58.6%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200 300−310
+57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 120−130
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 103 160−170
+55.3%
Fortnite 179 290−300
+62%
Forza Horizon 4 140 220−230
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 167 270−280
+61.7%
Valorant 248 400−450
+61.3%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 100−110 160−170
+58.4%
Battlefield 5 129 200−210
+55%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200 300−310
+57.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 400−450
+44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 120−130
+53.8%
Dota 2 140−150 220−230
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 99 160−170
+61.6%
Far Cry 6 95−100 160−170
+61.6%
Fortnite 155 250−260
+61.3%
Forza Horizon 4 131 210−220
+60.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 124 200−210
+61.3%
Metro Exodus 67 100−105
+49.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 159 250−260
+57.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 136 220−230
+61.8%
Valorant 247 400−450
+61.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 119 190−200
+59.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 120−130
+53.8%
Dota 2 140−150 220−230
+57.1%
Far Cry 5 94 150−160
+59.6%
Forza Horizon 4 105 170−180
+61.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 122 190−200
+55.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73 110−120
+50.7%
Valorant 162 260−270
+60.5%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 141 220−230
+56%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85 130−140
+56.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 350−400
+46.4%
Far Cry 6 60−65 100−105
+61.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 110−120
+59.4%
Metro Exodus 42 65−70
+54.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 280−290
+60%
Valorant 241 350−400
+45.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 140−150
+55.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry 5 80−85 130−140
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 150−160
+59.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65 100−105
+61.3%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 140−150
+57.3%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 27−30 40−45
+48.1%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 60−65
+57.9%
Far Cry 6 24−27 40−45
+60%
Grand Theft Auto V 67 100−105
+49.3%
Metro Exodus 26 40−45
+53.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 80−85
+56.9%
Valorant 208 300−310
+44.2%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 53 85−90
+60.4%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 60−65
+57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 27−30
+58.8%
Dota 2 100−110 160−170
+56.9%
Far Cry 5 41 65−70
+58.5%
Forza Horizon 4 59 95−100
+61%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 44 70−75
+59.1%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 38 60−65
+57.9%

This is how RTX 2060 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 58% faster in 1080p
  • PRO W7700 is 58% faster in 1440p
  • PRO W7700 is 60% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 33.64 54.56
Recency 7 January 2019 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 190 Watt

RTX 2060 has 16% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 62% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 58% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2060 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Arc B570 Arc B570
PRO W7700 Radeon PRO W7700
vs
RTX A5000 RTX A5000
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
vs
RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
RTX 2080 Ti GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
vs
PRO W7500 PRO W7500
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
R7 M270DX R7 M270DX
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
8200M G mGPU GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
vs
Pro V340 16 GB Pro V340 16 GB
W4150M FirePro W4150M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Xe Graphics G7 96EU
W4150M FirePro W4150M
vs
RX 6500 RX 6500
R5 M465 Radeon R5 M465
vs
RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
vs
Jetson Xavier NX GPU Jetson Xavier NX GPU
RTX 2070 RTX 2070
vs
RTX 3080 Max-Q 3080 Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 12755 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2060 or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.