Radeon RX 7650 GRE vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 Super and Radeon RX 7650 GRE, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2060 Super
2019, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 175 Watt
39.34
RX 7650 GRE
2025, $279
8 GB GDDR6, 165 Watt
42.77
+8.7%

7650 GRE outperforms RTX 2060 Super by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking128103
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation33.9192.97
Power efficiency17.5120.19
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameTU106Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date9 July 2019 (7 years ago)February 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $279

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 7650 GRE has 174% better value for money than RTX 2060 Super.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores21762048
Core clock speed1470 MHz1720 MHz
Boost clock speed1650 MHz2695 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate224.4345.0
Floating-point processing power7.181 TFLOPS22.08 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs136128
Tensor Cores272no data
Ray Tracing Cores3432
L0 Cacheno data512 KB
L1 Cache2.1 MB512 KB
L2 Cache4 MB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mm204 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI++
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.86.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA7.5-
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 2060 Super 39.34
RX 7650 GRE 42.77
+8.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Super 16457
Samples: 12939
RX 7650 GRE 17894
+8.7%
Samples: 30

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD111120−130
+8.1%
1440p6465−70
+1.6%
4K4345−50
+4.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.592.33
+35.3%
1440p6.234.29
+31.2%
4K9.286.20
+33.2%
  • RX 7650 GRE has 35% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 31% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE has 33% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 168 180−190
+7.1%
Counter-Strike 2 320
+6.7%
300−310
Cyberpunk 2077 88 95−100
+8%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 118 120−130
+1.7%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 124 130−140
+4.8%
Battlefield 5 117 120−130
+2.6%
Counter-Strike 2 285 300−310
+5.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 79 85−90
+7.6%
Far Cry 5 135 140−150
+3.7%
Fortnite 266 280−290
+5.3%
Forza Horizon 4 152 160−170
+5.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 147 150−160
+2%
Valorant 298 300−310
+0.7%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 73 75−80
+2.7%
Battlefield 5 101
+1%
100−105
Counter-Strike 2 175 190−200
+8.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 71 75−80
+5.6%
Dota 2 200 210−220
+5%
Far Cry 5 126 130−140
+3.2%
Fortnite 175 190−200
+8.6%
Forza Horizon 4 147 150−160
+2%
Grand Theft Auto V 139 150−160
+7.9%
Metro Exodus 81 85−90
+4.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 143 150−160
+4.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163 170−180
+4.3%
Valorant 293 300−310
+2.4%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 93 100−105
+7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 62 65−70
+4.8%
Dota 2 185 200−210
+8.1%
Far Cry 5 118 120−130
+1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120 130−140
+8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 123 130−140
+5.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85 90−95
+5.9%
Valorant 180 190−200
+5.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 148 160−170
+8.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 99 100−105
+1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 280−290 300−310
+7.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 86 90−95
+4.7%
Metro Exodus 49 50−55
+2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 190−200
+8.6%
Valorant 268 290−300
+8.2%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 74 80−85
+8.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40 40−45
Far Cry 5 88 95−100
+8%
Forza Horizon 4 98 100−105
+2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 80−85
+3.9%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 98 100−105
+2%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
Counter-Strike 2 23 24−27
+4.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 83 90−95
+8.4%
Metro Exodus 31
+3.3%
30−33
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59 60−65
+1.7%
Valorant 210 220−230
+4.8%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 48 50−55
+4.2%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 50−55
+6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
Dota 2 121 130−140
+7.4%
Far Cry 5 46 50−55
+8.7%
Forza Horizon 4 67 70−75
+4.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 49 50−55
+2%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 48 50−55
+4.2%

This is how RTX 2060 Super and RX 7650 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7650 GRE is 8% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 2% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7650 GRE is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 39.34 42.77
Chip lithography 12 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 165 Watt

RX 7650 GRE has a 9% higher aggregate performance score, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2060 Super and Radeon RX 7650 GRE.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 16059 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 121 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7650 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2060 Super or Radeon RX 7650 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.