Radeon PRO W7900D vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking362not rated
Place by popularity53not in top-100
Power efficiency44.63no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 3 (2023−2025)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 December 2021 (4 years ago)28 November 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed735 MHz1327 MHz
Boost clock speed1245 MHz2156 MHz
Number of transistors8.7 billion57.7 billion
Manufacturing process technology8 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt295 Watt
Texture fill rate79.68827.9
ROPs32192
TMUs64384
Tensor Cores64no data
Ray Tracing Cores1696
L0 Cacheno data3 MB
L1 Cache1 MB3 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data280 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.96.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.0
Vulkan1.41.4
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 December 2021 28 November 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 295 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has 90% lower power consumption.

PRO W7900D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Radeon PRO W7900D. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO W7900D is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3390 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon PRO W7900D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile or Radeon PRO W7900D, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.