RTX A2000 Embedded vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile with RTX A2000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.
RTX A2000 Embedded outperforms RTX 2050 Mobile by an impressive 55% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 365 | 250 |
| Place by popularity | 57 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 44.62 | 59.42 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GA107 | GA107S |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 17 December 2021 (4 years ago) | 30 March 2022 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 607 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1245 MHz | 1177 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 8.7 billion | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 79.68 | 94.16 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 6.026 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | 64 | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 20 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.0 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | + | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Portable Device Dependent |
| HDMI | + | - |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.9 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.6 | 8.6 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 42 | 65−70
+54.8%
|
| 1440p | 32 | 45−50
+40.6%
|
| 4K | 28 | 40−45
+42.9%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 74 | 110−120
+48.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 47 | 70−75
+48.9%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35 | 50−55
+51.5%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 25 | 35−40
+40%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 110−120
+48.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 67 | 100−105
+49.3%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 42 | 65−70
+54.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59 | 90−95
+52.5%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100 | 140−150
+47.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75 | 110−120
+52.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 35 | 50−55
+42.9%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70 | 100−105
+51.5%
|
| Valorant | 130−140 | 200−210
+49.3%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 110−120
+48.6%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40 | 60−65
+50%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 210−220 | 300−310
+37%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 29 | 45−50
+55.2%
|
| Dota 2 | 118 | 180−190
+52.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 53 | 80−85
+50.9%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100 | 140−150
+47.4%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75 | 110−120
+52.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 68 | 100−105
+47.1%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 26 | 40−45
+53.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40 | 55−60
+48.6%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70 | 100−105
+51.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 58 | 90−95
+55.2%
|
| Valorant | 130−140 | 200−210
+49.3%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 70−75 | 110−120
+48.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 25 | 35−40
+40%
|
| Dota 2 | 110 | 170−180
+54.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 49 | 75−80
+53.1%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75 | 110−120
+52.8%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 19 | 27−30
+42.1%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 65−70 | 100−105
+51.5%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 33 | 50−55
+51.5%
|
| Valorant | 130−140 | 200−210
+49.3%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100 | 140−150
+47.4%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 35−40 | 50−55
+42.9%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130 | 190−200
+48.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37 | 55−60
+48.6%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24 | 30−33
+36.4%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 160−170 | 250−260
+51.5%
|
| Valorant | 150−160 | 240−250
+54.8%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55 | 75−80
+50%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18 | 24−27
+50%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 37 | 55−60
+48.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45 | 65−70
+51.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20 | 27−30
+42.1%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27 | 40−45
+53.8%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45 | 60−65
+50%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 21−24
+40%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 30−35 | 45−50
+40.6%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 16−18
+45.5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 14−16 | 21−24
+50%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27 | 35−40
+40%
|
| Valorant | 90−95 | 130−140
+44.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27 | 40−45
+53.8%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16 | 21−24
+40%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 7−8 | 10−11
+42.9%
|
| Dota 2 | 34 | 50−55
+47.1%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18 | 27−30
+50%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35 | 45−50
+45.2%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 10−12 | 16−18
+45.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 16−18 | 24−27
+41.2%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 18−20 | 27−30
+50%
|
This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and RTX A2000 Embedded compete in popular games:
- RTX A2000 Embedded is 55% faster in 1080p
- RTX A2000 Embedded is 41% faster in 1440p
- RTX A2000 Embedded is 43% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.16 | 26.66 |
| Recency | 17 December 2021 | 30 March 2022 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | 35 Watt |
RTX 2050 Mobile has 14% lower power consumption.
RTX A2000 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 55% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 3 months.
The RTX A2000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
