Arc Graphics 2 Xe vs GeForce MX550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking495not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency32.13no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe3-LPG (2026−2027)
GPU code nameTU117SNova Lake-S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (4 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed1065 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1320 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate42.2436.80
Floating-point processing power2.703 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs3216
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L1 Cache2 MB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth96 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm

Arc Graphics 2 Xe has a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX550 and Arc Graphics 2 Xe. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 918 votes

Rate GeForce MX550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 2 Xe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX550 or Arc Graphics 2 Xe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.