UHD Graphics P750 vs GeForce MX450 25W

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.80
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameTU117Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (6 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores896256
Core clock speed720 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed930 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate52.0883.20
Floating-point processing power1.667 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs5664
L1 Cache896 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x4Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA7.5-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

MX450 25W has a 17% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics P750, on the other hand, has 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX450 25W and UHD Graphics P750. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX450 25W is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce MX450 25W on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX450 25W or UHD Graphics P750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.