FirePro M8900 vs GeForce MX350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking610not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.11no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP107Blackcomb
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)12 April 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640960
Core clock speed747 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9832.64
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3248
L1 Cache240 KB192 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 12 April 2011
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce MX350 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX350 and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX350 is a notebook graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1774 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.