Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile vs GeForce MX350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking611not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency26.11no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Xe3-LPG (2026)
GPU code nameGP107Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 February 2020 (6 years ago)27 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speed747 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed937 MHz2300 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate29.9873.60
Floating-point processing power1.199 TFLOPS2.355 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs3232
Ray Tracing Coresno data4
L1 Cache240 KB512 KB
L2 Cache512 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth56.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.9
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 February 2020 27 January 2026
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX350 has 25% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 367% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX350 and Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1774 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX350 or Arc Graphics 4 Xe Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.