Xe DG1 vs GeForce MX230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking725not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.57no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGP108DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 February 2019 (7 years ago)2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256640
Core clock speed1519 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1550 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate25.3162.00
Floating-point processing power0.81 TFLOPS1.984 TFLOPS
ROPs1620
TMUs1640
L1 Cache96 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data164 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 30 Watt

GeForce MX230 has 200% lower power consumption.

Xe DG1, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX230 and Xe DG1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook graphics card while Xe DG1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1515 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 34 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX230 or Xe DG1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.