Radeon Graphics 128SP vs GeForce MX230

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking730not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency33.64no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2 (2021−2025)
GPU code nameGP108Raphael
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date21 February 2019 (7 years ago)27 September 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256128
Core clock speed1519 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,800 million3.4 billion
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate25.3117.60
Floating-point processing power0.81 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs168
Ray Tracing Coresno data2
L0 Cacheno data32 KB
L1 Cache96 KB32 KB
L2 Cache512 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2019 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 15 Watt

GeForce MX230 has 33% lower power consumption.

Graphics 128SP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX230 and Radeon Graphics 128SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce MX230 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Graphics 128SP is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 1521 votes

Rate GeForce MX230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics 128SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX230 or Radeon Graphics 128SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.