GeForce GT 240M LE vs MX110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking798not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.72no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGM108SG96C
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 November 2017 (8 years ago)15 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25632
Core clock speed978 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1006 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,020 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate16.109.600
Floating-point processing power0.5151 TFLOPS0.096 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1616
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.7 (5.1)4.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 November 2017 15 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce MX110 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

GT 240M LE, on the other hand, has 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX110 and GeForce GT 240M LE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 2697 votes

Rate GeForce MX110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce MX110 or GeForce GT 240M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.