Tesla C2090 vs GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG71MGF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date12 October 2006 (19 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64512
Core clock speed16 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rateno data41.66
Floating-point processing powerno data1.332 TFLOPS
ROPsno data48
TMUsno data64
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data177.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR312 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-2.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2006 25 July 2011
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 250 Watt

Go 7950 GTX SLI has 64% lower power consumption.

Tesla C2090, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 56% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI and Tesla C2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Tesla C2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 3 votes

Rate Tesla C2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7950 GTX SLI or Tesla C2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.