Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7900 GS 7900 GS SLI 7900 GTX 7900 GTX SLI 7950 GTX 7950 GTX MXM-IV
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7900 GTX with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

Go 7900 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.65
RX 6750 XT
2022, $549
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
49.47
+7511%

6750 XT outperforms Go 7900 GTX by a whopping 7511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking126869
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.77
Power efficiency1.1215.41
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG71Navi 22
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (20 years ago)3 March 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed500 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speed500 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors278 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00416.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs24160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cacheno data3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7900 GTX 0.65
RX 6750 XT 49.47
+7511%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GTX 270
Samples: 2
RX 6750 XT 20695
+7565%
Samples: 5815

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−98.8%
163
1440p1−288
+8700%
4K0−150

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.37
1440pno data6.24
4Kno data10.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 165
+16400%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 127
+12600%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 190−200
+3740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2050%
Valorant 30−33 280−290
+853%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20 270−280
+1363%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 109
+10800%
Dota 2 12−14 154
+1183%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 190−200
+3740%
Metro Exodus 0−1 127
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 245
+3983%
Valorant 30−33 280−290
+853%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 98
+9700%
Dota 2 12−14 131
+992%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 190−200
+3740%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 135
+2150%
Valorant 30−33 280−290
+853%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 126
+6200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 350−400
+11967%
Far Cry 6 0−1 101
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 170−180
+2400%
Valorant 1−2 300−350
+32700%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 150−160
+15300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 100−110
+10600%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 130−140

4K
High

Far Cry 6 5−6 55
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 104
+643%
Valorant 6−7 290−300
+4850%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 80−85
+4000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 70−75
+3500%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353 353
Resident Evil 4 Remake 195 195

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Counter-Strike 2 346 346
Far Cry 5 178 178
Fortnite 210−220 210−220

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Counter-Strike 2 220 220
Far Cry 5 170 170
Far Cry 6 130 130
Fortnite 210−220 210−220
Grand Theft Auto V 162 162

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160 150−160
Far Cry 5 158 158

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220 210−220

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 106 106
Metro Exodus 76 76

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 60 60
Far Cry 5 141 141

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33 33
Metro Exodus 47 47
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79 79

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 80−85
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 60−65
Cyberpunk 2077 26 26
Dota 2 101 101
Far Cry 5 78 78
Forza Horizon 4 100−110 100−110

This is how Go 7900 GTX and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 8050% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 8700% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 32700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT performs better in 29 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.65 49.47
Recency 18 April 2006 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 250 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 82% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 7511% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 92% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GTX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
vs
HD 6370M Radeon HD 6370M
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
vs
HD 8400E Radeon HD 8400E
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
vs
RTX 3070 Ti GA102 RTX 3070 Ti GA102
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
vs
RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
GT 130M GeForce GT 130M
vs
Lisuan Tech LX 7G100 LX 7G100
Go 7900 GTX GeForce Go 7900 GTX
vs
RX 5800 XT RX 5800 XT
FX 2500M Quadro FX 2500M
vs
ATI Mobility X2500 Radeon X2500
9650M GS GeForce 9650M GS
vs
2 GPU 65nm
9650M GT GeForce 9650M GT
vs
8400M G GeForce 8400M G
9650M GT GeForce 9650M GT
vs
GeForce G102M GeForce G102M
9650M GT GeForce 9650M GT
vs
GTX 1660 GTX 1660

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3357 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.