Tegra K1 vs GeForce Go 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1334not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.62no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG71GK20A
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date18 April 2006 (20 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores27192
Core clock speed375 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz951 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt8 Watt
Texture fill rate7.5007.608
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3652 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1ES 3.1
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 8 Watt

Tegra K1 has a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GS and Tegra K1. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GS is a notebook graphics card while Tegra K1 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 10 votes

Rate Tegra K1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS or Tegra K1, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.