Tesla S1075 vs GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG7x (2005−2006)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG71MGT200B
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 June 2006 (20 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores54240 ×4
Core clock speed14 MHz610 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHzno data
Number of transistors556 Million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt800 Watt
Texture fill rateno data48.80 ×4
Floating-point processing powerno data0.6221 TFLOPS ×4
ROPsno data32 ×4
TMUsno data80 ×4
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB ×4
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit ×4
Memory clock speed500 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data102.4 GB/s ×4
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXGDDR311.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2006 1 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 800 Watt

Go 7900 GS SLI has 1900% lower power consumption.

Tesla S1075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI and Tesla S1075. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI is a notebook graphics card while Tesla S1075 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GS SLI or Tesla S1075, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.