Radeon RX 7900 GRE vs GeForce Go 7800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7800 GTX with Radeon RX 7900 GRE, including specs and performance data.

Go 7800 GTX
2005
512 MB GDDR3, 65 Watt
0.50
RX 7900 GRE
2023, $549
16 GB GDDR6, 260 Watt
65.63
+13026%

7900 GRE outperforms Go 7800 GTX by a whopping 13026% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131628
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data71.06
Power efficiency0.6019.66
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameG70Navi 31
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date29 September 2005 (21 years ago)27 July 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores325120
Core clock speed440 MHz1287 MHz
Boost clock speed440 MHz2245 MHz
Number of transistors302 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate10.56718.4
Floating-point processing powerno data45.98 TFLOPS
ROPs24160
TMUs24320
Ray Tracing Coresno data80
L0 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed550 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth35.2 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 7800 GTX 0.50
RX 7900 GRE 65.63
+13026%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7800 GTX 209
Samples: 8
RX 7900 GRE 27460
+13039%
Samples: 2176

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2206
+20500%
1440p0−1129
4K0−177

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.67
1440pno data4.26
4Kno data7.13

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 1−2 303
+30200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 208
+20700%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 1−2 232
+23100%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 184
+18300%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 260−270
+6475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
Valorant 27−30 350−400
+1252%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 1−2 150
+14900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18 270−280
+1535%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 158
+15700%
Dota 2 10−12 1400−1450
+12627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 260−270
+6475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 382
+6267%
Valorant 27−30 350−400
+1252%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 148
+14700%
Dota 2 10−12 1400−1450
+12627%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5 260−270
+6475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 170−180
+2063%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 209
+3383%
Valorant 27−30 350−400
+1252%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 200−210
+10150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3 500−550
+25700%
Far Cry 6 0−1 136
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6 170−180
+3400%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 220−230
+22600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 156
+15500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 150−160

4K
High

Far Cry 6 5−6 87
+1640%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 151
+979%
Valorant 5−6 300−350
+6260%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 95−100
+9500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Far Cry 5 174 174
Fortnite 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Far Cry 5 168 168
Far Cry 6 169 169
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 164 164
Metro Exodus 179 179

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Far Cry 5 155 155

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 130 130
Metro Exodus 111 111
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 98 98
Far Cry 5 154 154

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Metro Exodus 71 71
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 125 125

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 45 45
Far Cry 5 107 107
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180

This is how Go 7800 GTX and RX 7900 GRE compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE is 20500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 7900 GRE is 30200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 7900 GRE performs better in 29 tests (49%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.50 65.63
Recency 29 September 2005 27 July 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 260 Watt

Go 7800 GTX has 75% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 GRE, on the other hand, has a 13026% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 95% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7800 GTX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7800 GTX is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 8 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1251 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7800 GTX or Radeon RX 7900 GRE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.