Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU vs GeForce Go 7700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7200 7300 7300T 7400 7400T 7450 7600 7600 GT 7700 7800 7800 GTX 7800 GTX SLI 7900 GS 7900 GS SLI 7900 GTX 7900 GTX SLI 7900 SE 7950 GTX 7950 GTX MXM-IV 7950 GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
B370 B390 G3 G3 Extreme Graphics 2 Xe Mobile Graphics 4 Xe Mobile Pro B370 Pro B390 Graphics 2 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7700 and Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7700
2006
512 MB GDDR3
0.35

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU outperforms Go 7700 by a whopping 3174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 7700 Go 7700
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1370469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG73Panther Lake
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 August 2006 (20 years ago)5 January 2026 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1732
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speed450 MHz2450 MHz
Number of transistors177 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nmno data
Texture fill rate5.400no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed500 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−131

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
Valorant 27−30
−264%
100−110
+264%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
−1093%
160−170
+1093%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−264%
100−110
+264%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Dota 2 10−11
−2900%
300−310
+2900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−500%
40−45
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 27−30
−3114%
900−950
+3114%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−1000%
21−24
+1000%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−8600%
85−90
+8600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−3150%
130−140
+3150%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
Valorant 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−1000%
10−12
+1000%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 59
+0%
59
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is 8600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU performs better in 26 tests (47%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (53%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.35 11.46
Recency 1 August 2006 5 January 2026

Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU has a 3174% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 19 years.

The Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7700 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7700 GeForce Go 7700
vs
HD 6320 Radeon HD 6320
Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
Go 7700 GeForce Go 7700
vs
ATI Mobility HD 4550 Mobility Radeon HD 4550
ATI Mobility HD 5470 Mobility HD 5470
vs
GeForce3 GeForce3
ATI Mobility HD 5470 Mobility HD 5470
vs
RTX 5070 Ti RTX 5070 Ti
GeForce G210M G210M
vs
RX 9060 XT 8 GB RX 9060 XT 8 GB
Go 7600 GT Go 7600 GT
vs
Graphics 3-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 3 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Go 7700 Go 7700
vs
HD 8740 OEM HD 8740 OEM
ATI Mobility HD 540v Mobility HD 540v
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
ATI Mobility HD 4530 Mobility HD 4530
vs
Radeon 780M 780M
ATI HD 4350 HD 4350
vs
HD 8350G HD 8350G
ATI HD 4350 HD 4350
vs
HD 7450 OEM HD 7450 OEM
ATI HD 4350 HD 4350
vs
ATI HD 3870 HD 3870

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 29 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7700 or Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.