Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs GeForce Go 7200
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 7200 and Arc 7-Cores iGPU, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
7-Cores iGPU outperforms Go 7200 by a whopping 13836% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1526 | 385 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Xe LPG (2023−2025) |
| GPU code name | G72 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 September 2006 (19 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 7 | 7 |
| Core clock speed | 450 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 112 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 5 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1.800 | no data |
| ROPs | 1 | no data |
| TMUs | 4 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 350 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 2.8 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_2 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | -0−1 | 34 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 32 |
| Palworld | 2−3
−1650%
|
35
+1650%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 27 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
−1550%
|
33
+1550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−729%
|
55−60
+729%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−425%
|
120−130
+425%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 10−11
−1940%
|
200−210
+1940%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 23 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−13650%
|
1100−1150
+13650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| Palworld | 2−3
−1150%
|
25
+1150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−729%
|
55−60
+729%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−940%
|
52
+940%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−425%
|
120−130
+425%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 22 |
| Dota 2 | 8−9
−13650%
|
1100−1150
+13650%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−3150%
|
65−70
+3150%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−729%
|
55−60
+729%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−340%
|
22
+340%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−13650%
|
3300−3350
+13650%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 2−3
−1050%
|
23
+1050%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−12900%
|
130−140
+12900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−2200%
|
21−24
+2200%
|
1440p
Epic
| Palworld | 0−1 | 21−24 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−86.7%
|
27−30
+86.7%
|
| Valorant | 4−5
−1825%
|
75−80
+1825%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1400%
|
14−16
+1400%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 90
+0%
|
90
+0%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 36
+0%
|
36
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 58
+0%
|
58
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 38
+0%
|
38
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 31
+0%
|
31
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 34
+0%
|
34
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 23
+0%
|
23
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70
+0%
|
65−70
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 35
+0%
|
35
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 85−90
+0%
|
85−90
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 110−120
+0%
|
110−120
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Valorant | 140−150
+0%
|
140−150
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Palworld | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
4K
Epic
| Palworld | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 3150% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc 7-Cores iGPU performs better in 21 tests (40%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (60%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.11 | 15.33 |
| Recency | 1 September 2006 | 14 December 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 5 nm |
Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 13836% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.
The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
