Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GeForce Go 6800
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce Go 6800 with Quadro T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
T1200 Mobile outperforms Go 6800 by a whopping 6900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1439 | 353 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.43 | 75.21 |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | NV41 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 8 November 2004 (21 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 17 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 300 MHz | 1425 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 190 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.600 | 91.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 2.918 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 32 |
| TMUs | 12 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| Interface | MXM-III | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 550 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 35.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial) | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | - | 7.5 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 0−1 | 58 |
| 1440p | -0−1 | 33 |
| 4K | 1−2
−8000%
| 81
+8000%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Palworld | 3−4
−6900%
|
210−220
+6900%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2333%
|
70−75
+2333%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−6900%
|
210−220
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−857%
|
65−70
+857%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−448%
|
130−140
+448%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 12−14
−1600%
|
220−230
+1600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−1167%
|
114
+1167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2333%
|
70−75
+2333%
|
| Palworld | 3−4
−6900%
|
210−220
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−857%
|
65−70
+857%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−1320%
|
71
+1320%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−448%
|
130−140
+448%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 9−10
−1089%
|
107
+1089%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−2333%
|
70−75
+2333%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8
−857%
|
65−70
+857%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−640%
|
37
+640%
|
| Valorant | 24−27
−6900%
|
1750−1800
+6900%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Palworld | 3−4
−6900%
|
210−220
+6900%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
−6900%
|
140−150
+6900%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 3−4
−6900%
|
210−220
+6900%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−6900%
|
70−75
+6900%
|
1440p
Epic
| Palworld | 0−1 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−113%
|
30−35
+113%
|
| Valorant | 5−6
−1720%
|
90−95
+1720%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1700%
|
18−20
+1700%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65
+0%
|
65
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 59
+0%
|
59
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 71
+0%
|
71
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 56
+0%
|
56
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 95−100
+0%
|
95−100
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 37
+0%
|
37
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 150−160
+0%
|
150−160
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 41
+0%
|
41
+0%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
4K
High
| Metro Exodus | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 109
+0%
|
109
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 20−22
+0%
|
20−22
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
This is how Go 6800 and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile is 8000% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1200 Mobile is 2333% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- T1200 Mobile performs better in 17 tests (40%)
- there's a draw in 25 tests (60%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.25 | 17.50 |
| Recency | 8 November 2004 | 12 April 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 18 Watt |
T1200 Mobile has a 6900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 983% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6800 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
