GeForce 9500M GE vs Go 6800 Ultra

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1388not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.29no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameNV41MCP79Mx + NB9M
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date24 February 2005 (21 years ago)9 January 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1724
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology130 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate5.400no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)10.0
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2005 9 January 2008
Chip lithography 130 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 25 Watt

9500M GE has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 256% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and GeForce 9500M GE. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6800 Ultra or GeForce 9500M GE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.