UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs GeForce Go 6600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6100 6100 + nForce Go 430 6150 6150 + nForce Go 430 6200 6200 TE 6250 6400 6600 6600 NPB 128M 6600 TE 6800 6800 Ultra
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G1 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 Xe 16EUs Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) Xe 750 32EUs Xe G1 Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6600 and UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 6600
2005
256 MB DDR
0.17

Graphics G4 48EUs outperforms Go 6600 by a whopping 2453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 6600 Go 6600
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1495727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.99
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameNV43 A2Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)15 August 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1248
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed375 MHz1450 MHz
Number of transistors146 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology110 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data28 Watt
Texture fill rate2.400no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRno data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed350 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−116

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 11

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 9−10
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Valorant 27−30
−33.3%
36
+33.3%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−12
−127%
25
+127%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 9−10
Dota 2 8−9
−225%
26
+225%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−200%
15
+200%
Valorant 27−30
−111%
55−60
+111%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 9−10
Dota 2 8−9
−200%
24
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−60%
8
+60%
Valorant 27−30
−111%
55−60
+111%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 10−11
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Valorant 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 46
+0%
46
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
Far Cry 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16
+0%
16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Far Cry 5 15
+0%
15
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 10
+0%
10
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Far Cry 5 14
+0%
14
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs performs better in 24 tests (44%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (56%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.17 4.34
Recency 29 September 2005 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 110 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs has a 2453% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1000% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6600 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 6600 GeForce Go 6600
vs
ATI E2400 Radeon E2400
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
vs
GeForce MX230 GeForce MX230
Go 6600 GeForce Go 6600
vs
Go 6800 GeForce Go 6800
ATI Mobility X2500 Mobility Radeon X2500
vs
GTX 1080 11Gbps GeForce GTX 1080 11Gbps
ATI Mobility X2500 Mobility Radeon X2500
vs
GeForce4 440 Go GeForce4 440 Go
ATI Mobility X2500 Mobility Radeon X2500
vs
RX 6600 LE Radeon RX 6600 LE
Go 7600 GeForce Go 7600
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
ATI Mobility 9800 Mobility Radeon 9800
vs
Tesla S870 Tesla S870
Go 6600 GeForce Go 6600
vs
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
ATI Mobility X700 Mobility Radeon X700
vs
ATI 9800 PRO Mac Edition Radeon 9800 PRO Mac Edition
ATI Mobility FireGL V5000 Mobility FireGL V5000
vs
K2000M Embedded Quadro K2000M Embedded
G 110M GeForce G 110M
vs
E9172 MXM Radeon E9172 MXM
G 110M GeForce G 110M
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 6 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 567 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6600 or UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.