GeForce RTX 5080 vs Go 6200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6100 6100 + nForce Go 430 6150 6150 + nForce Go 430 6200 6200 TE 6250 6400 6600 6600 NPB 128M 6600 TE 6800 6800 Ultra
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5050 5060 5060 GB205 5060 Ti 8 GB 5060 Ti 16 GB 5070 5070 Ti 5080 5090 5090 D 5090 DD 5090 D V2 5090 SE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6200 with GeForce RTX 5080, including specs and performance data.

Go 6200
2006
32 MB DDR, 16 Watt
0.04
RTX 5080
2025, $999
16 GB GDDR7, 360 Watt
85.51
+213675%

RTX 5080 outperforms Go 6200 by a whopping 213675% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Go 6200 Go 6200
RTX 5080 RTX 5080

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking15684
Place by popularitynot in top-10077
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data49.08
Power efficiency0.1918.38
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNV44 A2GB203
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)30 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores710752
Core clock speed300 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speed300 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors75 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt360 Watt
Texture fill rate1.200879.3
Floating-point processing powerno data56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs2112
TMUs4336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L1 Cacheno data10.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount32 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6200 0.04
RTX 5080 85.51
+213675%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6200 15
Samples: 18
RTX 5080 35626
+237407%
Samples: 19017

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD-0−1199
1440p-0−1148
4K-0−1101

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data5.02
1440pno data6.75
4Kno data9.89

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
−11350%
220−230
+11350%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−17100%
300−350
+17100%
Palworld 2−3
−11350%
220−230
+11350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2371%
170−180
+2371%
Valorant 21−24
−2487%
550−600
+2487%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−2989%
270−280
+2989%
Dota 2 7−8
−213471%
14950−15000
+213471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−17100%
300−350
+17100%
Palworld 2−3
−11350%
220−230
+11350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2371%
170−180
+2371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7960%
400−450
+7960%
Valorant 21−24
−2487%
550−600
+2487%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−213471%
14950−15000
+213471%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−17100%
300−350
+17100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2371%
170−180
+2371%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−5480%
279
+5480%
Valorant 21−24
−2487%
550−600
+2487%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−11350%
220−230
+11350%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−14350%
280−290
+14350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 170−180

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 300−350
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−23100%
232
+23100%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1147%
180−190
+1147%
Valorant 4−5
−7875%
300−350
+7875%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−7800%
75−80
+7800%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Far Cry 5 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 173
+0%
173
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 55
+0%
55
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 232
+0%
232
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5080 is 23100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 performs better in 22 tests (37%)
  • there's a draw in 38 tests (63%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.04 85.51
Recency 1 February 2006 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 360 Watt

Go 6200 has 2150% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 213675% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 6200 GeForce Go 6200
vs
Go 6100 GeForce Go 6100
RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5080
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
Go 6200 GeForce Go 6200
vs
GeForce 7000M GeForce 7000M
Go 6250 NVIDIA Go 6250
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB A3000 Mobile 12 GB
Go 6200 NVIDIA Go 6200
vs
R5 430 OEM 430 OEM
Go 6200 NVIDIA Go 6200
vs
HD 8350 OEM 8350 OEM
Go 6200 NVIDIA Go 6200
vs
GRID M60-8Q M60-8Q
Go 6200 NVIDIA Go 6200
vs
RTX 4060 Max-Q 4060 Max-Q
FX Go 5600 / 5650 NVIDIA FX Go 5600 / 5650
vs
GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q 1050 Ti Max-Q
FX Go 5600 / 5650 NVIDIA FX Go 5600 / 5650
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q 1050 Max-Q
ATI Xpress 1250 ATI Xpress 1250
vs
R2 Mobile Graphics Mobile Graphics
ATI Xpress 1250 ATI Xpress 1250
vs
Arc 5 A550M A550M
ATI Xpress X1200 ATI Xpress X1200
vs
ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP LT PRO AGP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 3460 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 or GeForce RTX 5080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.