ATI FireGL X3-256 vs GeForce Go 6200 TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameNV43 A4R420
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 September 2005 (20 years ago)3 August 2004 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,099

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed300 MHz491 MHz
Number of transistors146 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data57 Watt
Texture fill rate1.2005.892
ROPs412
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz454 MHz
Memory bandwidth4.8 GB/s29.06 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.12.0
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2005 3 August 2004
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 130 nm

Go 6200 TE has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireGL X3-256, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6200 TE and FireGL X3-256. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6200 TE is a notebook graphics card while FireGL X3-256 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 1 vote

Rate GeForce Go 6200 TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate FireGL X3-256 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6200 TE or FireGL X3-256, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.