GRID M60-2Q vs GeForce Go 6100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 6100 with GRID M60-2Q, including specs and performance data.

Go 6100
2006
0.04

M60-2Q outperforms Go 6100 by a whopping 31125% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1566446
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.29
Architectureno dataMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameC51MVGM204
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2006 (20 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32048
Core clock speed1 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speed425 MHz1178 MHz
Number of transistorsno data5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rateno data150.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.825 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data128
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeshared MemoryGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data2 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXshared Memory12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Go 6100 0.04
GRID M60-2Q 12.49
+31125%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 6100 17
Samples: 88
GRID M60-2Q 5203
+30506%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Palworld 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%

Full HD
Medium

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
Palworld 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−30614%
2150−2200
+30614%
Valorant 21−24
−30987%
7150−7200
+30987%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10
−31011%
2800−2850
+31011%
Dota 2 7−8
−30614%
2150−2200
+30614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
Palworld 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−30614%
2150−2200
+30614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−30900%
1550−1600
+30900%
Valorant 21−24
−30987%
7150−7200
+30987%

Full HD
Ultra

Dota 2 7−8
−30614%
2150−2200
+30614%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−30614%
2150−2200
+30614%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−30900%
1550−1600
+30900%
Valorant 21−24
−30987%
7150−7200
+30987%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−29900%
600−650
+29900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−30900%
4650−4700
+30900%
Valorant 4−5
−29900%
1200−1250
+29900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−29900%
300−310
+29900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.04 12.49
Recency 1 February 2006 30 August 2015
Chip lithography 110 nm 28 nm

GRID M60-2Q has a 31125% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 293% more advanced lithography process.

The GRID M60-2Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6100 is a notebook graphics card while GRID M60-2Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 19 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GRID M60-2Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 6100 or GRID M60-2Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.