Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs GeForce GTX TITAN Z

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB TITAN BLACK TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 450 Pro 460 Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575 Pro 580 Pro 580X Pro WX 3200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN Z with Radeon Pro WX 3200, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN Z
2014, $2,999
12 GB GDDR5, 375 Watt
21.35
+298%

TITAN Z outperforms Pro 3200 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN Z GTX TITAN Z
Pro WX 3200 Pro WX 3200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302675
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.152.53
Power efficiency4.406.38
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGK110BPolaris 23
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date28 May 2014 (12 years ago)2 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Pro WX 3200 has 120% better value for money than GTX TITAN Z.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5760 ×2640
Core clock speed705 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed876 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)375 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate210.2 ×234.62
Floating-point processing power5.046 TFLOPS ×21.385 TFLOPS
ROPs48 ×216
TMUs240 ×232
L1 Cache240 KB160 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width3-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount12 GB ×24 GB
Memory bus width768-bit (384-bit per GPU) ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth672 GB/s ×264 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN Z 21.35
+298%
Pro WX 3200 5.36

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN Z 8896
+298%
Samples: 133
Pro WX 3200 2235
Samples: 55

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX TITAN Z 17130
+443%
Pro WX 3200 3156

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+295%
19
−295%
4K30−35
+275%
8
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p39.99
−282%
10.47
+282%
4K99.97
−302%
24.88
+302%
  • Pro WX 3200 has 282% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Pro WX 3200 has 302% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 20
+0%
20
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+0%
15
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 35
+0%
35
+0%
Far Cry 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
+0%
10
+0%
Valorant 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Palworld 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Palworld 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
+0%
5
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 9
+0%
9
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Palworld 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN Z and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN Z is 295% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN Z is 275% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.35 5.36
Recency 28 May 2014 2 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 375 Watt 65 Watt

GTX TITAN Z has a 298% higher aggregate performance score, and a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 3200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 477% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX TITAN Z is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop graphics card while Radeon Pro WX 3200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
R9 295X2 Radeon R9 295X2
Pro WX 3200 Radeon Pro WX 3200
vs
Quadro M600M Quadro M600M
GTX TITAN Z GeForce GTX TITAN Z
vs
RX 580 Radeon RX 580
GTX TITAN Z NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z
vs
9300M GS 9300M GS
GTX TITAN Z NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z
vs
GeForce 945A 945A
GTX TITAN Z NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z
vs
ATI X800 PRO X800 PRO
GTX TITAN Z NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z
vs
8400 GS 8400 GS
GTX TITAN Z NVIDIA GTX TITAN Z
vs
ATI Mobility Radeon
GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GT 705 OEM
vs
ATI Wii GPU GPU
GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GT 705 OEM
vs
ATI 8514-Ultra
GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GT 705 OEM
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X 3060 Ti GDDR6X
GT 705 OEM NVIDIA GT 705 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 10EU Mobile 10EU Mobile
GTX 745 OEM NVIDIA GTX 745 OEM
vs
Pro Vega 64X Vega 64X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3 99 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 112 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN Z or Radeon Pro WX 3200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.