Arc Graphics 140V vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
750 GM206 750 v2 950 950 Low Power 950 OEM 960 960 OEM 970 980 980 Ti TITAN X Tegra X1
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Graphics 112EU Mobile Graphics 128EU Mobile Graphics 130T Graphics 130V Graphics 140T Graphics 140V

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX TITAN X with Arc Graphics 140V, including specs and performance data.

GTX TITAN X
2015, $999
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.02
+143%

TITAN X outperforms Graphics 140V by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX TITAN X GTX TITAN X
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking217452
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.81no data
Power efficiency9.29no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Xe² (2024)
GPU code nameGM200Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 March 2015 (11 years ago)24 September 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30728
Core clock speed1000 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate209.1no data
Floating-point processing power6.691 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data
L1 Cache1.1 MBno data
L2 Cache3 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options4x-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sno data
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2no data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX TITAN X 30.02
+143%
Arc Graphics 140V 12.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX TITAN X 12508
+143%
Samples: 1908
Arc Graphics 140V 5139
Samples: 4588

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+131%
39
−131%
1440p55−60
+129%
24
−129%
4K45−50
+137%
19
−137%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.10no data
1440p18.16no data
4K22.20no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 44
+0%
44
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 85
+0%
85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 70
+0%
70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 30
+0%
30
+0%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+0%
61
+0%
Valorant 137
+0%
137
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18
+0%
18
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Valorant 114
+0%
114
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX TITAN X and Arc Graphics 140V compete in popular games:

  • GTX TITAN X is 131% faster in 1080p
  • GTX TITAN X is 129% faster in 1440p
  • GTX TITAN X is 137% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.02 12.34
Recency 17 March 2015 24 September 2024
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm

GTX TITAN X has a 143% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 140V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 833% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX TITAN X is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 140V in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX TITAN X is a desktop graphics card while Arc Graphics 140V is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
GTX 1660 Ti GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Arc Graphics 140V Arc Graphics 140V
vs
R9 M295X Radeon R9 M295X
GTX TITAN X GeForce GTX TITAN X
vs
RTX 3050 8 GB GeForce RTX 3050 8 GB
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
HD 7850M HD 7850M
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
HD 7650M Rebrand HD 7650M Rebrand
GTX 1060 6 GB GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
vs
Pro V620 Pro V620
GT 610 OEM GeForce GT 610 OEM
vs
GMA 950 GMA 950
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4050 Mobile
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 6750M HD 6750M
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
HD 6530 HD 6530
GT 710 GeForce GT 710
vs
R5 A220 R5 A220

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 307 votes

Rate GeForce GTX TITAN X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 104 votes

Rate Arc Graphics 140V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX TITAN X or Arc Graphics 140V, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.