ATI Radeon IGP 340M vs GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3251622
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.37no data
Power efficiency7.64no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Rage 6 (2000−2007)
GPU code nameGM204RS200
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date21 September 2015 (11 years ago)5 October 2002 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.82 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482
Core clock speed1064 MHz183 MHz
Boost clock speed1216 MHz180 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million30 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100-200 Wattno data
Texture fill rate136.20.37
Floating-point processing power4.358 TFLOPSno data
ROPs642
TMUs1282
L1 Cache768 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2No outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)7.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99no data
4K46no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.00no data
4K8.60no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+875%
4−5
Resident Evil 4 Remake 45−50 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3950%
2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+875%
4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1000%
7−8
Valorant 140−150
+484%
24−27

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Counter-Strike 2 110−120 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+2850%
8−9
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 110−120
+1500%
7−8
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Fortnite 100−110 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3950%
2−3
Grand Theft Auto V 84 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+875%
4−5
Metro Exodus 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1000%
7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+1580%
5−6
Valorant 140−150
+484%
24−27

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Dota 2 110−120
+1500%
7−8
Far Cry 5 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+3950%
2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+875%
4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80
+1000%
7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+780%
5−6
Valorant 140−150
+484%
24−27

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+4000%
1−2
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 24−27 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 170−180 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+329%
14−16
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 no data
Metro Exodus 16−18 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Valorant 100−110
+2550%
4−5

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 18−20 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9 no data
Dota 2 65−70 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+1900%
1−2

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+2000%
1−2

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980 Mobile is 4000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 980 Mobile surpassed ATI IGP 340M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 September 2015 5 October 2002
Chip lithography 28 nm 180 nm

GTX 980 Mobile has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 84% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 980 Mobile and Radeon IGP 340M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 86 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon IGP 340M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 Mobile or Radeon IGP 340M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.