Matrox Parhelia APVe vs GeForce GTX 965M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking520not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.42no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameGM206SParhelia-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date2016 (10 years ago)14 June 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed944 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknownno data
Texture fill rate73.601.000
Floating-point processing power2.355 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs644
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
BatteryBoost+-
Ansel+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.51.5
OpenCL1.1N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 965M 3883
+77560%
Samples: 1092
Matrox Parhelia APVe 5
Samples: 3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm

GTX 965M has a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 965M and Matrox Parhelia APVe. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 965M is a notebook graphics card while Matrox Parhelia APVe is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 119 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia APVe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 965M or Matrox Parhelia APVe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.