GMA 3150 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2781617
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.57no data
Power efficiency7.03no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGK110BPineview
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 November 2013 (12 years ago)9 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores288016
Core clock speed875 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,080 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate222.70.8
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs481
TMUs2402
L1 Cache240 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount3 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth336 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortNo outputs
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.5 (5.1)3.0
OpenGL4.42.0
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.175N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9470
+473400%
Samples: 4819
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD96no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.28no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Palworld 55−60 no data
Resident Evil 4 Remake 50−55 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Palworld 55−60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
Palworld 55−60 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data
Palworld 55−60 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 55−60 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data
Palworld 30−35 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data
Palworld 18−20 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 November 2013 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 13 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 61% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 1823% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 780 Ti and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop graphics card while GMA 3150 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 742 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 181 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Ti or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.