Radeon RX 6600S vs GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB TITAN BLACK TITAN Z
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6600M 6600S 6650M 6650M XT 6700S 6800S

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 with Radeon RX 6600S, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Rev. 2
2013, $649
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
9.90

6600S outperforms 780 Rev. 2 by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2
RX 6600S RX 6600S

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking503191
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.14no data
Power efficiency3.0931.59
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK110BNavi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 September 2013 (13 years ago)4 January 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041792
Core clock speed863 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate173.2224.0
Floating-point processing power4.156 TFLOPS7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs192112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache192 KB512 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.5-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 95−100 95−100
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 75−80

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 95−100 95−100
Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 180−190
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 75−80
Far Cry 5 100−110 100−110
Fortnite 140−150 140−150
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 130−140
Valorant 200−210 200−210

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 95−100 95−100
Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 180−190 180−190
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 75−80
Dota 2 130−140 130−140
Far Cry 5 100−110 100−110
Far Cry 6 95−100 95−100
Fortnite 140−150 140−150
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120 110−120
Metro Exodus 75−80 75−80
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 130−140
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 110−120
Valorant 200−210 200−210

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80 75−80
Dota 2 130−140 130−140
Far Cry 5 100−110 100−110
Forza Horizon 4 120−130 120−130
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140 130−140
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 110−120
Valorant 200−210 200−210

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 140−150

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240 230−240
Far Cry 6 55−60 55−60
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 65−70
Metro Exodus 45−50 45−50
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 230−240 230−240

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 35−40
Far Cry 5 75−80 75−80
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 90−95
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 55−60

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90 85−90

4K
High

Atomic Heart 24−27 24−27
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 35−40
Far Cry 6 21−24 21−24
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70 65−70
Metro Exodus 27−30 27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55 50−55
Valorant 190−200 190−200

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55 50−55
Counter-Strike 2 35−40 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 16−18
Dota 2 100−105 100−105
Far Cry 5 40−45 40−45
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 60−65
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45 40−45

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45 40−45

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 9.90 32.43
Recency 10 September 2013 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

RX 6600S has a 228% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 68% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop graphics card while Radeon RX 6600S is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R7 265 Radeon R7 265
RX 6600S Radeon RX 6600S
vs
RX 6700M Radeon RX 6700M
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
R9 270 Radeon R9 270
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 460 1024SP RX 460 1024SP
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
ATI X600 Radeon X600
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
Millennium G250
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
RTX 3060 3840SP RTX 3060 3840SP
vs
GTX 780 Rev. 2 780 Rev. 2
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
Quadro Quadro
GTX 760 OEM Rebrand GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
vs
RX Vega 24 Mobile RX Vega 24 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 14 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 27 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 or Radeon RX 6600S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.