Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
670MX 675MX 675MX Mac Edition 680M 680MX Mac Edition 775M Mac Edition 780M 780M Mac Edition 870M 880M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
10EU Mobile 4200 4400 4600 5000 Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Pro Graphics 5200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition and Iris Graphics 5100, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 775M Mac Edition
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
3.02
+70.6%

775M Mac Edition outperforms Graphics 5100 by an impressive 71% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 775M Mac Edition GTX 775M Mac Edition
Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Graphics 5100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking827988
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.344.57
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameGK104Haswell GT3
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2013 (12 years ago)27 May 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1344320
Core clock speed797 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate89.2644.00
Floating-point processing power2.142 TFLOPS0.704 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs11240
L1 Cache112 KBno data
L2 Cache512 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.3
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
+61.5%
13
−61.5%
4K10−12
+42.9%
7
−42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 31
+0%
31
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how GTX 775M Mac Edition and Iris Graphics 5100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 62% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 775M Mac Edition is 43% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.02 1.77
Recency 8 November 2013 27 May 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 775M Mac Edition has a 71% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 5 months.

Iris Graphics 5100, on the other hand, has a 27% more advanced lithography process, and 233% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Graphics 5100 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
Radeon 610M Radeon 610M
Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Graphics 5100
vs
HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 615
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
GT 750M Mac Edition NVIDIA GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
Vega 6 Mobile Efficient 6 Mobile Efficient
GT 750M Mac Edition NVIDIA GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
R7 M260DX M260DX
GT 750M Mac Edition NVIDIA GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
RX 5700 XT 5700 XT
GT 750M Mac Edition NVIDIA GT 750M Mac Edition
vs
RTX 2060 Super 2060 Super
GTX 775M Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 520 520
GTX 775M Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
HD Graphics 4000 4000
GTX 775M Mac Edition NVIDIA 775M Mac Edition
vs
RTX 2060 2060
GTX 775M Mac Edition GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
GTX 1650 GeForce GTX 1650
GTX 775M Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
RX 540X 540X
GTX 775M Mac Edition NVIDIA GTX 775M Mac Edition
vs
Iris Xe Graphics 96EU 96EU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 34 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 144 votes

Rate Iris Graphics 5100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition or Iris Graphics 5100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.