T600 vs GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Place in the ranking	447	390
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.43	29.55
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	no data	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	30 May 2013 (13 years ago)	6 May 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	640
Core clock speed	811 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	53.40
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	40
L1 Cache	no data	640 KB
L2 Cache	no data	1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x mini-DisplayPort

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.2
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 770M SLI 12.47

T600 15.28
+22.5%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 770M SLI 9569
+10.1%

T600 8694

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −35%	54 +35%
1440p	18−20 −27.8%	23 +27.8%
4K	16−18 −25%	20 +25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −24.6%	85−90 +24.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Palworld	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
Resident Evil 4 Remake	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5	55−60 −21.8%	65−70 +21.8%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −24.6%	85−90 +24.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −12.2%	46 +12.2%
Fortnite	70−75 −17.8%	85−90 +17.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −18.5%	60−65 +18.5%
Palworld	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −23.9%	55−60 +23.9%
Valorant	110−120 −13.6%	120−130 +13.6%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5	55−60 −21.8%	65−70 +21.8%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 −24.6%	85−90 +24.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	170−180 −14.7%	200−210 +14.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Dota 2	80−85 −44%	121 +44%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −2.4%	42 +2.4%
Fortnite	70−75 −17.8%	85−90 +17.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −18.5%	60−65 +18.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	45−50 −25.5%	59 +25.5%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	26 +0%
Palworld	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −23.9%	55−60 +23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −45.5%	48 +45.5%
Valorant	110−120 −13.6%	120−130 +13.6%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 −21.8%	65−70 +21.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Dota 2	80−85 −32.1%	111 +32.1%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +5.1%	39 −5.1%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −18.5%	60−65 +18.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −23.9%	55−60 +23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +22.2%	27 −22.2%
Valorant	110−120 −13.6%	120−130 +13.6%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite	70−75 −17.8%	85−90 +17.8%
Palworld	27−30 −24.1%	35−40 +24.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	90−95 −21.3%	110−120 +21.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	18−20 −42.1%	27 +42.1%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	15 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 −69.5%	130−140 +69.5%
Valorant	120−130 −17.1%	140−150 +17.1%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	30−35 −29.4%	40−45 +29.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +3.8%	26 −3.8%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −22.6%	35−40 +22.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −22.2%	21−24 +22.2%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite	27−30 −29.6%	35−40 +29.6%
Palworld	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −4.2%	25 +4.2%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +12.5%	8 −12.5%
Palworld	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 +0%	16 +0%
Valorant	55−60 −30.5%	75−80 +30.5%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	16−18 −35.3%	21−24 +35.3%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%
Dota 2	45−50 +15%	40 −15%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +8.3%	12 −8.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%

4K
Epic

Fortnite	12−14 −25%	14−16 +25%
Palworld	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%

This is how GTX 770M SLI and T600 compete in popular games:

T600 is 35% faster in 1080p
T600 is 28% faster in 1440p
T600 is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 770M SLI is 22% faster.
in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the T600 is 70% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 770M SLI performs better in 6 tests (9%)
T600 performs better in 56 tests (86%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.47	15.28
Recency	30 May 2013	6 May 2021
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	40 Watt

T600 has a 23% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 133% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 770M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 770M SLI is a notebook graphics card while T600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Radeon R9 M295X

T600

Tesla M6

GeForce GTX 770M SLI

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 770M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

4.2 708 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 770M SLI or T600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.