GeForce FX Go 5200 vs GTX 765M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 765M SLI and GeForce FX Go 5200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
765M SLI outperforms FX Go 5200 by a whopping 49400% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 500 | 1575 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 5.89 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | no data |
| GPU code name | no data | NV31M |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 May 2013 (13 years ago) | 1 March 2003 (23 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1536 | 5 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 1 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 2540 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | medium sized |
| SLI options | + | - |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | 32 MB |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | DDR |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 71 | -0−1 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+414%
|
7−8
−414%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+258%
|
24−27
−258%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 197
+2089%
|
9−10
−2089%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 70−75
+929%
|
7−8
−929%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Fortnite | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 20−22 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+414%
|
7−8
−414%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+258%
|
24−27
−258%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 70−75
+929%
|
7−8
−929%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
+414%
|
7−8
−414%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+420%
|
5−6
−420%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+258%
|
24−27
−258%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 60−65 | 0−1 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 18−20
+1800%
|
1−2
−1800%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 75−80 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 10−12 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 95−100 | 0−1 |
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 14−16
+1300%
|
1−2
−1300%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 21−24 | 0−1 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 8−9 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
+42.9%
|
14−16
−42.9%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Valorant | 45−50
+1025%
|
4−5
−1025%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| Far Cry 5 | 10−11 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 9−10
+800%
|
1−2
−800%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 2089% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GTX 765M SLI surpassed FX Go 5200 in all 20 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.90 | 0.02 |
| Recency | 30 May 2013 | 1 March 2003 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 150 nm |
GTX 765M SLI has a 49400% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX Go 5200 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
