RTX A500 vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A with RTX A500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
2.57

RTX A500 outperforms 760A by a whopping 511% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking880382
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6220.27
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK106GA107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)10 November 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682048
Core clock speed628 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05113.3
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS7.25 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cache64 KB2 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 760A 2.57
RTX A500 15.71
+511%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760A 1071
Samples: 9
RTX A500 6544
+511%
Samples: 939

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 15.71
Recency 17 March 2014 10 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 60 Watt

GTX 760A has 9% lower power consumption.

RTX A500, on the other hand, has a 511% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while RTX A500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 170 votes

Rate RTX A500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or RTX A500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.