RTX A4500 Embedded vs GeForce GTX 760A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A with RTX A4500 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
2.57
RTX A4500 Embedded
2022
16 GB GDDR6, 80 Watt
21.36
+731%

RTX A4500 Embedded outperforms 760A by a whopping 731% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking879301
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.6120.65
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK106GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speed628 MHz510 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHz1215 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate42.05223.6
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS14.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs64184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache64 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache256 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.08.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 760A 2.57
RTX A4500 Embedded 21.36
+731%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760A 1071
Samples: 9
RTX A4500 Embedded 8899
+731%
Samples: 14

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.57 21.36
Recency 17 March 2014 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 80 Watt

GTX 760A has 45% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Embedded, on the other hand, has a 731% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook graphics card while RTX A4500 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 28 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate RTX A4500 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or RTX A4500 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.