Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs GeForce GTX 750

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Xe Graphics G4 Xe Graphics G4 48EU Mobile Xe Graphics G7 80EU Xe Graphics G7 96EU Xe MAX Graphics UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile UHD Graphics 32EU

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 750 with Iris Xe MAX Graphics, including specs and performance data.

GTX 750
2014, $119
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
7.89
+83.1%

GTX 750 outperforms MAX Graphics by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 750 GTX 750
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking577728
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.94no data
Power efficiency11.1013.34
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGM107DG1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 February 2014 (12 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512768
Core clock speed1020 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1085 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature95 °Cno data
Texture fill rate34.7279.20
Floating-point processing power1.111 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3248
L1 Cache256 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5.0 GB/s2133 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini-HDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 750 7.89
+83.1%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 4.31

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 750 3288
+83%
Samples: 7200
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1797
Samples: 9

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 750 3970
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 6333
+59.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%
1440p35−40
+75%
20
−75%
4K27−30
+68.8%
16
−68.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.64no data
1440p3.40no data
4K4.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 26
+0%
26
+0%
Fortnite 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 25
+0%
25
+0%
Fortnite 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 20
+0%
20
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Far Cry 5 24
+0%
24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+0%
18
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 22
+0%
22
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+0%
11
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 20
+0%
20
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 750 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 750 is 67% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 750 is 75% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 750 is 69% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.89 4.31
Recency 18 February 2014 31 October 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 750 has a 83% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe MAX Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 750 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 750 is a desktop graphics card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
GTX 590 GeForce GTX 590
Iris Xe MAX Graphics Iris Xe MAX Graphics
vs
GeForce MX130 GeForce MX130
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
R7 260X Radeon R7 260X
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
210 Rev. 2 GeForce 210 Rev. 2
GTX 750 GTX 750
vs
GTX 480 512 GTX 480 Core 512
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
GMA X4500 GMA X4500
GTX 750 GTX 750
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh
GTX 750 GeForce GTX 750
vs
Steam Deck GPU Steam Deck GPU
GTX 750 GTX 750
vs
RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
R5 M320 Radeon R5 M320
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
Iris Graphics 5100 Iris Graphics 5100
GTX 650 GeForce GTX 650
vs
HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 2852 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 292 votes

Rate Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 750 or Iris Xe MAX Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.